Where did it go wrong for Villa’s  £24 Million Man Darren Bent? Update

 

As Villa fans we thought we’d seen the last of Darren Bent when he was exiled by Paul Lambert to the ‘Bomb Squad’ last season with a ‘3’ slotted in front of the ‘9’ on his shirt. Bent managed to escape off loan to Fulham and MOMS wrote the original version of this article as a kind of arbitrary piece for Villa’s record-signing.

The striker failed to earn a move away from Villa Park in the summer, not aided by Fulham’s relegation, but with Lambert’s U-turn on the Bomb Squad, Bent was again in the Villa picture this season.

Ultimately, he was only used occasionally as a sub in the last few minutes of games and it was evident that his rift with Lambert hadn’t healed ala Alan Hutton. Bent fired some parting shots at the Villa boss on signing a short-term loan deal with Brighton, before signing a loan deal to the end of the season with Derby County.

The Belgian Influence

Bent had been on borrowed time at Villa ever since it turned out that Christian Benteke was really rather good at this football lark, and was stripped of his number nine shirt and demoted to the nether regions of the Villa squad list at No.39, a move that sums up the direction his Villa career has gone over previous last nine months.

Bent’s response was a rare public venting of frustration on Twitter. “Gutted to lose my No. 9 shirt. Unfortunately one of those things I have to deal with. KTF”. Though he sticks by his “keep the faith” mantra, those words must ring hollow for him at the moment, as he has become increasingly ostracised at the club who broke the bank to sign him just three-and-a-half years ago.

Lerner Extravagance

The purchase of Bent for an eventual £24 million was an uncharacteristic extravagance by Randy Lerner in January 2011, and an extravagance that has not come close to being repeated since.

It was a huge statement from Lerner, and a great show of faith in then-manager Gerard Houllier. Villa were toiling in seventeenth position, only out of the relegation zone on goal difference, and had been struggling for goals throughout the first half of the season.

Lerner clearly recognised that this was the sort of signing that the club had to make to ensure their survival. Bent was (and still is) a proven goal scorer. With a goals-to-games ratio of 0.4 at Ipswich, 0.47 at Charlton, 0.32 at Spurs and 0.57 at Sunderland, it seemed certain that Bent was the man who could get Villa out of trouble. The price paid to Sunderland for Bent’s services was no doubt an inflated one, but ironically, for many Villa supporters, the England international was  the striker they always considered the final piece needed for Martin O’Neill’s Villa team, before the former Villa manager had his transfer credit line cut off by Lerner.

It all started so well. Villa fans had a new hero after just eighteen minutes of Bent’s Villa  debut when he scored what proved to be the winner over Manchester City at Villa Park.

 

 

Bent went on to finish with nine goals in sixteen games for the club in 2010-11, and, to be frank, his goals were probably what saved the club from the drop. He scored both goals in the 2-2 draw at Goodison Park, the equaliser in the 1-2 win at Upton Park, in the 1-1 home draw with Stoke, and both goals in the marvellous 1-2 win over Arsenal on the penultimate day of the season. Without those goals, Villa would have seriously struggled.

Turning Point

It was under Alex McLeish that things started to sour for Bent at Villa, as the new manager’s insistence on implementing a defensive 4-5-1 formation isolated the centre-forward (often by a distance of around fifty yards) and utterly starved him of the support that a player such as Bent desperately needs.

The fact that Bent still managed to score eleven goals by the start of February is indicative of his natural goal-scoring prowess. However, the issue was that he has never been a striker who creates and scores his own chances – he relies heavily on the playmaking of others from midfield, and ideally requires a different type of centre-forward to play alongside, things he was never really given under McLeish.

Bad luck played its part too, undoubtedly. After scoring in four consecutive games in January and early February, Bent ruptured his ankle ligaments in a dour away draw at Wigan, an injury which prematurely cut short his season. Two weeks later, Andi Weimann burst onto the scene by scoring his first Villa goal as a lack of attacking options forced McLeish’s hand.

Bent didn’t help himself at times, however. Most notoriously, there was the incident in December 2011 when the striker was photographed out shopping in Cambridge whilst supposedly recovering from injury and while his team-mates were losing 0-2 at home to Liverpool.

Life Under Lambert

After the arrival of Lambert, Bent was initially given chances. Named during pre-season as Villa’s captain in Stiliyan Petrov’s absence, he scored in the League Cup win over Tranmere in August, and in back-to-back games in late September.

However, injuries took their toll on Bent again in 2012-13. He picked up an ankle injury in training in early November, and was substituted in the first half of the 1-4 win at Carrow Road in the League Cup in December with a hamstring problem that saw him miss the entire Christmas period, a hectic run of fixtures in which he surely would have played some part.

He scored on his return in the FA Cup win over Ipswich in early January, but was sidelined again after picking up a knock in the first leg of the League Cup semi-final. In late February, Bent then injured his foot in training and did not return to full fitness until early April.

 

 

Although his persistent injuries meant that he was never able to find any consistency or to string together a run of games for Villa last season, perhaps a larger factor was the fact that he once again failed to adapt to a change in system at Villa.

It quickly became obvious that Lambert’s preferred formation was an effective 4-3-3, which meant formation that was ultimately unsuitable for Bent. From being forced to play up top with a huge chasm between himself and the flat Villa midfield under McLeish, he would now be required to link up with the attackers playing just off him, bringing them into the game whilst also looking to create his own chances.

Bent has never really been suited to this style of play, and by this point of course, Villa had found somebody else to do this job. The revelation of Christian Benteke foreshadowed the end of Bent’s Villa career from relatively early on last season, as Lambert never really showed any interest in playing the two centre-forwards together – which is perhaps a shame in some ways, as it could be argued that Benteke is exactly the kind of attacking partner with which Bent would have flourished.

As well as the tactics Lambert prefers to play at Villa, repeated spells on the sidelines had something to do with Bent never really having a chance to strike up a partnership with Benteke, but it was obvious from early on, that Villa’s manager didn’t fancy Bent as his first-choice striker, and Lambert taking the captaincy away from Bent after just four games of the season and passing the responsibility to new signing Ron Vlaar was ultimately a sign of what was to come.

Upon finding himself being overlooked in October, Bent gave an interview with the Mirror. “I’m not going to sulk about it,” he claimed. “I’ll give it as long as it takes. From my perspective, I’m more than happy at Aston Villa and to play my football here.”

Discontent

But Bent was hardly candid in talking about his feelings with respect to being stripped of the role of captain, or about being dropped so early in the season.

“At first I was shocked to get the captaincy, but I was delighted with it. Then I was shocked to lose it. It was disappointing but I have to get on with it. It’s the manager’s decision – he appointed me captain and then took it away.

“That’s down to him, but it’s frustrating for me. And to score my first goal of the season then be out of the team the following week was also a shock.

“All managers have their styles and that’s his. He’s dropped a lot of us and he hasn’t got to answer to anyone.”

And in an interview with the Daily Star in May, it seemed that his patience, rather unsurprisingly, had run out.

“It is about playing and, at my age, I can’t have another season like this one. Time is running out.I’m not really one of these guys who want to sit there, not do anything and get paid.”

Trying to get Lambert to commit to giving his true thoughts on how Bent actually fitted into his plans though, would prove a fruitless task for the press when they encountered the Villa boss.

In many respects, Bent is perhaps right to feel hard done by. But above all, perhaps, is the fact that Bent simply does not fit the model of what Lambert is doing at Villa. At the age of 30, it seems extremely unlikely that Bent’s game will improve much further, and any club signing him now has a player past his peak.

Bent’s reported £65,000-a-week wage has been a stumbling block to Lambert bringing in players at the higher end of the quality scale to Villa, but not a reason for making the former England striker an outcast at Villa, with him often lying behind the likes of Jordan Bowery and Nicklas Helenius when it came to match day squad selection.

It would have been unthinkable when he signed that Bent would find himself so brutally surplus to requirements.

All in all, though, Bent deserves to be remembered well at Villa. Until he became overshadowed by Benteke’s explosive first season, he was undoubtedly Villa’s first-choice centre-forward, and he ended with a pretty respectable one-in-three strike rate at the club.

Loan Form

Last season, his Fulham loan form last season was patchy and didn’t help the club survive after managing only three goals in 24 appearances. But he did manage a couple of goals in his five outings for Brighton. No doubt he’ll relish a chance to play for Derby, a team that is at the right end of the league table and winning.

Derby will undoubtedly be getting a proven goalscorer, but one who needs to be played in the right way in order to maximise the abilities he still possesses.

Good luck DB9, and thanks for the goals once upon a time ago.

 

Follow MOMS on Twitter

Follow Tom on Twitter

Opt In Image
BECOME A FREE MOMS E-MEMBER
Exclusive extras, newsletter & supporter issues news
SHARE

5 COMMENTS

  1. I don’t think Lambert can be entirely blamed for Bent’s decline. If he switched to 442 with Benteke and Bent up front then we would’ve lost Gabby’s attacking pace which assisted most of Benteke’s goals in his first season. McLeish playing him on his own had a worse impact on the lad’s career, but hopefully he can finish well with Derby.

  2. Interesting to think how he could have flourished alongside Tekkers. Both would probably have benefited from that. Both with goals and Tekkers having someone to score from the chances he creates. I really do wish him well and I feel a bit sorry for the lad.

  3. and lambert could have changed the style to suit him,, with wide players getting crosses in

    but were stuck with 433 and no goals

LEAVE A REPLY