When the news first filtered into MOMS HQ that Yannick Bolasie was returning to Everton from his loan at Aston Villa, the only thought that crossed MOMS mind was of the wasted time of the previous night, discussing the player’s best role for Villa for the next My Old Man Said podcast episode.

His return to Everton wasn’t exactly a big deal, considering his contribution in a Villa shirt.

The conclusion on the show had been that the winger had tended to work best as an impact substitution. Coming off the bench to torment tiring defences had been his most productive work in a Villa shirt. While Bolasie seemed to be able to focus for those shorter periods, his interest and intensity tended to wane, when he started games.

A Championship team paying a player serious wages though, just to be an impact sub was poor business. In other words, considering Villa’s need to keep wary eye on FFP, they could ill-afford such luxury players.

  

Backlash

Recently, Villa fans on social media had turned on the player (it doesn’t take much nowadays when Villa are mid-table), not helped by clickbait articles that collect ‘hate tweets’ to bash a player. Some fans had tweeted the player, telling him what they thought of him and ‘advising’ him to go back to Everton.

You couldn’t blame him, if he thought, “Well good luck in mid-table, I’m off.”

Since, there’s been differing reports of whether it was the club’s decision or the player’s wish. MOMS is settling for it being a mutual decision.

The following day, misfit goalkeeper Andre Moreira was sent back to Atletico Madrid, as Villa continued trimming off the squad’s fat.

Twitter football scholars had initially based their opinion on the keeper, on the headlines of a clean sheet and penalty save in his debut in Villa’s 1-0 League Cup win at Yeovil. Those who actually watched the game though, had raised eyebrows at his overall performance – from his decision-making to his handling.

At times, he looked like an outfield player filling in between the sticks, after the goalkeeper has been sent off.

What did the Villa goalkeeping scouts actually see in him? Had they even bothered to watch him in action beforehand?

Moreira was ultimately a loan to back-up Orjan Nyland (although a pointless one, considering Jed Steer was already on the payroll), but it was the Bolasie loan that stands as more of a concern in terms of the club’s outlook and planning in terms of its transfer policy.

Why Bolasie?

What were Villa thinking when it came to getting Bolasie on loan in the first place?

You could tell at the start of Bolasie’s loan period at Villa, all was not well, in terms of player’s fitness, as his involvement was held back.

The winger had previously been out for a year after damaging his anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus in his right knee in a game for Everton against Manchester United on December 4, 2016.

He returned on Boxing Day 2017, but fast-forward to the summer before this season and Bolasie failed to cement himself in the plans of the Everton manager, Marco Silva, for this season.

What was the purpose of the loan deal to Villa?

For Everton, it made perfect sense. Get another team to help with his rehabilitation, meanwhile paying at least a percentage of his expensive wages (it’s been reported that Villa have paid all £70k-a-week, but that seems unlikely considering the financial situation Villa were in during the summer). It would in the very least, lessen the speed of Bolasie’s drastic devaluation from the £22m+ Everton were reported to have paid Crystal Palace for the player.

The player, if he knuckled down and focused on his football at Villa, would have a chance to impress his parent club and get his career back on track.

So, what were the benefits for Villa?

Well, that’s the questionable thing. Bolasie had played games for Everton since his major injury, so Villa supporters all assumed we were getting a player that was match fit and ready to go. He just needed games to get up to speed again.

He evidently wasn’t firing on all cylinders though.

It took a while for Bolasie to be involved, but when he was finally used, Bolasie did provide end product in terms of assists and a couple of goals, from the bench. So, there was promise there, but then things seemed to stagnate and he never became the player Villa needed.

“He showed periods of the class that he’s got, just not as consistent as he would have liked, hence him ‘recalling’ himself,” said Dean Smith, on Bolasie going back to Merseyside.

Yet, in the same breath Smith added, “He felt that it was time to go back and try and push his way into the Premier League.”

So, too inconsistent for the Championship, so lets try and play in the Premier League instead?

That doesn’t make too much sense.

Also, Everton boss, Silva has stated that Bolasie has next to no chance of playing for Everton in the remainder of the season.

“We have four wingers in our squad and we are happy with them,” said Silva, in reference to Bolasie’s return.

He added:

“When he took the decision to come back we didn’t expect it, even though he has that option in his contract.”

Bolasie’s Villa Contribution

Bolasie’s 12 appearances off the bench made Bolasie the most used substitute for Villa (he also made nine starts), while he played the 12th most minutes (954 mins) of any Villa squad member.

He managed the same amount of goals (two) and assists (four) as Jack Grealish did in around twice the amount of playing time (Grealish played 1829 mins).

While that looks like it’s Grealish that needs to pull his socks up (and his shin pads), when it comes to end product (and he probably does to be fair), Grealish was very much the glue and drive of the team. Bolasie’s pass completion at 72.3% was over 15% below Grealish’s and the lowest of any Villa starter this season, bar Tammy Abraham.

Ultimately, Bolasie failed to deliver. The key stat of him starting less than of half Villa’s games is a very poor return for his top-end weekly wage.

Vanity Choice?

The issue remains that it was Aston Villa’s choice in the first place to bring him in.

With Middlesbrough publicly interested too at the time, it seemed from the outside, at least, that the club had snagged a player who’s last transfer fee was £22m to give them a competitive edge in the division.

The reality though was Villa had got player that the management and recruitment team had perhaps bought, based on his past achievements, rather than looking at the reality of the present – the player’s current fitness, ability and motivation.

If we are to believe Villa were paying his £70,000-a-week wages, then you have to question what exactly did Villa learn from the previous season’s short-termism?

John Terry and Robert Snodgrass were reported to be on a similiar wages. Regardless of the individual impact of the player, if Villa fail to gain promotion, then the player leaves and the team is back to square one. There’s no player development or potential for improvement through the previous season’s experience.

Also, you may have noticed several of Villa’s high profile loans have been prone to long-term injury. While Bolasie had been drip fed into the team, Axel Tuanzebe has been injury prone during his loan periods with Villa, while John Terry also spent a period on the sidelines.

Loans to plug gaps is one thing, but using them as your main assets in the hope of promotion, will potentially see a team treading water for years to come, if the promotion mission fails.

Team Building

Likewise, in the case of Bolasie and Moreira, these loans saw Villa’s own players Andre Green and Jed Steer shipped out on loan to lower league clubs.

While hindsight is 20/20, both players would have featured for Villa this season, if they had stayed, so they would have developed as proper team members in terms of Villa’s future.

There is no exact science in squad-building, but from Martin O’Neill onwards, Villa’s seems to have been made-up season-to-season and reeking of short-termism.

No Villa manager or CEO seemings to have learnt from the mistakes of his predecessor and any long-term planning seem to exist as pure fantasy, ala ‘the Villa Engine’.

We await eagerly to see how Villa’s latest regime tackle the art of team-building.

UTV

Transfer Deadline Competition

Done Deal book

It’s time to get educated about the in’s and out’s of transfer deals and we have just the thing to help you learn the inside track of the ever evolving business of football transfers.

MOMS is giving away five copies of the recently released Done Deal by football lawyer and writer Daniel Geey, which gives you all the context and nuance of how modern football now works.

Simply email the answer to the following question to [email protected] with the subject ‘Done Deal’.

Who is Aston Villa’s all-time record signing?

MOMS Patrons will be automatically entered into the competition.

Click here -> For more details on Done Deal and to buy it at a reduced price

Listen to the latest podcast below:

my old man said itunes

3 COMMENTS

  1. Bolasie was another disastrous bit of business. If one of our youngsters had had 20 games to impress we would be 2m in pocket, may have helped develop one of ours instead if someone else’s and motivate other players. We may also have a few more points in the bag. Our record of loans is very poor only Terry, Snodgrass, and Abraham have proved fruitful. Even Johnson loan was dreadful with us developing a player for our rivals he cost us points early in his loan and we were too stupid to have contingency plans if he came good which he did. It seems we are continuing down this dreadful path with the club and playing staff getting weaker each seaso, while the management team gets bigger and bigger. I don’t know all the answers but I do know if we carry on as we are, we will have point deductions, fines, lose our best players, training ground, and possible relegation which is far more likely than promotion. I cannot understand why successful businessmen allow this to happen.

  2. Couldn’t agree more all talk no action but this is typical of our club now I see we’re talking about Austin but if Wolves are after him there’s only one winner, so come on we’re rapidly running out of time we desperately need proven players as you say prepared to work like Mc Ginn, why are we considering players carrying injuries or haven’t played for months that won’t help us, a couple of days ago the press were calling Downing a Villa fans favourite, in your dreams no way we want him back did the dirty on us and way past his sell by date not what we need. Same old Same old every transfer window leaving it too late and ending up with the dross that’s left. I believe we will record a win this weekend, but even against the bottom team I’m not that confident.

  3. Agree with MOMS very disappointed with lack of action in transfer market, why are we getting players in who haven’t played for ages,are unfit or carrying injuries. We need more players with John McGinn work rate players who can hit the ground running, so much talk and no action whilst others are snapping up player’s and getting on with it. Let’s get cracking on a LB,CB,RB and DM before time and season runs out, can’t afford any more sloppy displays.UTV.

What do you think? Comment...